Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Profit over people: Inhumanity of capitalism

Part Two of Two

The Daily Barometer

Published: Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Updated: Thursday, February 16, 2012 04:02

 

Capitalism and its prioritizing of wealth accumulation has a profound psychological effect on people.  

In "The Power of Money," Karl Marx says, "Money is the procurer between man's need and the object, between his life and his means of life.  But that which mediates my life for me, also mediates the existence of other people for me.  For me it is the other person." Marx is arguing that when money is the medium of exchange, everything is looked at in terms of how much money it is worth, even if that "object" is a person.  

How much does a minimum wage worker deserve to make?  Their worth is dependent on how valuable their job is, not the virtue of the person.  Just because a job may be objectively easy to do, that doesn't mean the labor itself is any less intensive.  I know this from five consistent years of minimum wage work.  When anyone is asked why minimum wage workers don't make more, however, the answer is always dependent on the amount of wealth somebody is accumulating off of that labor, on the logical nature of business within a capitalist structure.

Then, it begs the question, what is the goal of a society?  To create an environment where human needs are met, people can live with freedom, sufficient opportunity to become a well-rounded individual, to provide an environment where there is an established quality of life and to pursue their interests.  I argue that capitalism does not create this kind of society, neither in the United States nor around the world.  

Without a laboring class (who does all the work, with the lowest wages), wealth could not be accumulated at such an astonishing rate by the bourgeoisie; capitalism is a system predicated on worker exploitation.  The great ethicist and philosopher Immanuel Kant claimed that it is fundamentally immoral to use people as a means to an end, and that is exactly what capitalism does.  It uses people as a means of labor to meet an end of accumulated profit.

More humane systems of government are out there; capitalism is not an inherent trait of human life or society.  Capitalism has not always existed and will not always exist.  We should actively try to create a global society that places human values and needs over the pursuit of profit.  After all, we are human beings.  

It is time to realize that each person's needs are as profound as our own, and to ignore the suffering that capitalism creates; ‘because we like really cool gadgets' is a fundamentally immoral position.  As the anthropologist David Graeber has said:

"The things we care most about — our loves, passions, rivalries, obsessions — are always other people; and in most societies that are not capitalist, it's taken for granted that the manufacture of material goods is a subordinate moment in a larger process of fashioning people. In fact, I would argue that one of the most alienating aspects of capitalism is the fact that it forces us to pretend that it is the other way around, and that societies exist primarily to increase their output of things."

 

Sean Tipton is a junior in philosophy. The opinions expressed in his columns do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Barometer staff. Tipton can be reached at forum@dailybarometer.com.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Anonymous
Mon Feb 20 2012 08:14
I agree with you when you say, "It's easy to label me as a 'communist'". It is and you are. You semi-skillfully diverted the issue from your statement that the "laboring class" does "ALL the work," which is a indefensible proposition, to the obvious claim that workers are necessary. As a philosophy major, have you ever taken a course in formal Logic? I know it is offered, and I strongly endorse your taking the course and applying it to your thought processes.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 19:22
Where would the engineers be without the workers who build their bridges? Where would entrepreneurs be without the wage slave laborers that manufacture their products? Where would Steve Jobs have been without the people at FoxConn manufacturing Apple's prodoctus?

And what is wrong with Unions? Fighting for workers rights? Do you have a problem with the 40 hour work week, weekends, sick days, pensions, and child labor laws?

Yes, wealth is created. I established that. Certain individuals prosper, sure, but CERTAINLY not everybody. Ask the Zapatistas or the Chilean students how neoliberal capitalist policies worked out for them, or the Argentinian factory workers. Capitalism IS exploitation of the many by the few. It's easy to label me as a "communist," but I would urge you to look at the facts and at the effect capitalism has had on the world.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 08:53
What a giant load of commie crap! You say the "laboring class" does "all the work." What are all those people in those tall buildings doing if not working? Do engineers, doctors, and creative people work? Do inventors and entrepreneurs work? Physical labor is not the only way "work" is done. Stop bashing capitalism. When both unions and corporate monopolists are controlled, and real capitalism with competition unfettered is practiced, incredible wealth is created and individuals and society prosper. Socialism and communism, on the other hand, brings nothing but misery and shared poverty.






log out