Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Hopoi should stay; let’s focus on the real issues

Guest Column

ASOSU

Published: Monday, February 20, 2012

Updated: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 03:02


 

ASOSU, like most organizations, does need substantial improvement. We need to see change, but we do not need President M. "Tonga" Hopoi to leave office to achieve the results.

It would be foolish to pin all of ASOSU's problems on one person. Change will not come through resignation or removal of office. Change will come through identifying and tending to the roots of the problem. The resignation or removal of President Hopoi will not solve any of the organization's problems.

Let me first say that I agree with a couple oppositional arguments. There has been a complete failure in training and advising. ASOSU (all branches) needs increased oversight and accountability. And ASOSU's money, which is the student body's money, needs to be handled with more insight. Just a few things that do need to change…

First, we must implement sufficient training and advising for ASOSU. Both the OSA issue and this recent one would have been properly handled from the start if proper training were in place. The president and vice president should have all the information they need available to them before taking office. Furthermore, we at Oregon State University are students first. To expect the president to know every statute and protocol without viable training or sufficient advising is to expect her to neglect her academic duties for work.

Second, the Legislative Branch needs to work toward fixing an issue before calling for the impeachment or removal of the president. The farce of an impeachment trial in fall 2011 was an embarrassment for the student population in front of the entire state. Is this the image we wish to broadcast on their behalf?

Mishandling issues and disagreements like this negatively affects internal operations as well. The presidency is more than one person and when one attacks the presidency, he or she attacks the entire chain of individuals who work for it. The issue over the pay raise needs to be handled with the utmost care and foresight, and without automatic hostility, or else it will lead to an even bigger embarrassment for us all.

Third, the Legislative Branch needs to be reworked. ASOSU senators are unpaid. This creates a system where those in charge of our student government's by-laws are more likely to succumb to apathy or to invest in personal interests rather than representing the students at large.

The system of implementation is also broken: There are almost always more seats available than students running, and there is no minimum amount of votes required to become elected. Therefore, students running with personal agendas can become Senators and make huge impacts in ASOSU without actually representing the student body.

Fourth – and this is key – all branches of ASOSU need to be held accountable systematically. If ASOSU does this, decisions can be discussed before they become a potent issue for the entire student body. I recommend this be done through a third-party board of appointed officials who receive sufficient training and advising. That way, we wouldn't see as much back-and-forth unproductive bickering in the coming years.

As the executive-ordered pay raise moves into the spotlight, we must remain levelheaded and perceptive. Many great accomplishments have come since President Hopoi and Vice President Sokho Eath took office.

ASOSU is working to bring the Student Experience Center to fruition. OSU is the only Oregon University System school with projects in the Capitol Construction bill secured.

ASOSU is working to increase hours of operation for SafeRide even further for student safety. ASOSU is bridging the gap with the Cultural Centers — OSU may host the Oregon Students of Color Coalition 2012 conference.

ASOSU is developing the Human Services Resource Center for independence and growth for next year. Relationships with university administrators and the Faculty Senate have strengthened due to this ASOSU Administration's work.

ASOSU is saving students' money by submitting its most efficient budget in years with a decrease in per-student fees. ASOSU is working to keep tuition low in the first Tuition Setting process mandated by OUS, where students and administration work together in the decision-making process.

ASOSU is partnering with administration for the first ever OSU-City of Corvallis Collaboration Project Task Forces for better livability, transit and parking, and neighborhood planning.

These are just a few of the successes ASOSU has achieved since June 2011.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Anonymous
Tue Feb 21 2012 22:04
ASOSU should have gotten their facts straight about their own administration before sending this response.

First and foremost is the issue of having a knowledgeable ASOSU President and Vice President who receive the trainings and information they need before coming into their positions. One quick look at President Hopoi and VP Eath's qualifications for taking on this office was that they both worked for the ASOSU Executive Branch during the 2010-2011 academic year. They did have all the trainings and time they needed to make the right decisions.

Any student leader on campus over the summer will also know that the ASOSU hosts a summer long professional development program that has been in place for the last three years. This last summer, that very training program was cancelled by the ASOSU.

ASOSU staff works 40 hours a week over the summer while students are not here to gain the knowledge, connections and trainings they need to best serve the students of Oregon State University. Getting to know the statutes and constitution of an organization that a paltry number of students elected you to uphold should not come at any expense to academic or professional pursuits.

I agree with Mr. Marquez that we should not simply look at one or two individuals when questioning this presidency. We should consider all of the parties involved in making the decision. If it was up to the ASOSU cabinet as reported then there were 10 individuals who should have handled the pay raises with "the utmost care and foresight". Obviously they did not, both with the issues of pay raises and in the fall with pulling out of the Oregon Student Association.

Students, do your research on these so called "victories" or works in progress that ASOSU is working on, and maybe you'll notice the farce in calling these things anything but business as usual for a student government.

One last thing that really grinds my gears: students over the last hundred years on this campus have fought to maintain the level of student fees that they charge in order to provide sufficient resources for their peers on this campus, and there is no way that the ASOSU should be proposing a budget that lowers the student fee if they expect to provide HSRC autonomy, increase the hours of Saferide, and expect to provide the cabinet members of the executive branch a "living wage" of $11.00+ an hour.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 21 2012 17:15
Please, do the state a favor and resign now before you are forced out. The executive, not legislative branch is an embarrassment to the entire state. I wince at the thought that one day soon you will be cast adrift into the real world with the expectation that you will be coddled at every step and never held accountable for your actions.

Because this ultimately boils down to the fact that you were too lazy/stupid/drunk/incompetent to read the rules and are now a problem that has to be dealt with.

A Concerned Student
Tue Feb 21 2012 13:24
Not surprising coming from a member of the executive branch. How many second chances does Hopoi get? If illegal pay raises for almost the entire executive branch, including herself and the Vice-President, isn't grounds for removal from office then I don't know what is. The students of Oregon State University deserve better. Stop making excuses about not knowing the statutes, if having knowledge of the statutes was too monumental of a task for this administration then maybe they should not have taken on the responsibility in the first place. Rules are in place for a reason, previous accomplishments and being democratically elected do not make you immune to the consequences of your failures. Finally the Barometer was the one calling for Hopoi to step down, not the House of Representatives, at this time no articles of impeachment have been issued, but one can only hope.






log out